AAI Labs
Main
Services
CasesResearchTeam
Company
More
Contact
Loading…

Services

  • AI for Energy
  • AI for Municipalities
  • AI for Transport
  • Generative AI
  • LLM for Business
View all services →

Company

  • About
  • Careers
  • Cases
  • Privacy Policy
  • Public R&D
  • Contact

More

  • EU AI Act hub
  • AI dictionary
  • Research
  • Blog
  • News

Products

  • AI Team for Hire
  • Merkys.AI
  • Cargobroker.AI
  • Klikt

UAB Taikomasis dirbtinis intelektas © 2026

[email protected]LinkedIn →
Research paper2025

Assessing the Performance of NMF and GMM in the Soft Classification of Kidney Stones: Insights from FTIR Data

Identifying kidney stone composition guides treatment — but rare stone types strain neural-network methods. We show that combining NMF dimensionality reduction with a Gaussian Mixture Model on FTIR spectra achieves 75% concordance even with limited samples.

Read the paper

Abstract

This paper evaluates non-negative matrix factorisation and Gaussian mixture modelling for soft classification of kidney stones from FTIR spectral data. The clinical motivation is that accurate stone composition analysis supports treatment planning and recurrence prevention.

Authors

Aistis Raudys, Aušra Šubonienė, Arūnas Želvys

What the study evaluates

The study focuses on rare or mixed stone compositions, where data scarcity can limit neural-network approaches. It examines whether NMF can provide a useful low-dimensional representation and whether GMM can express uncertainty through soft class assignments.

Main findings

The combination of NMF and GMM provides a practical route for composition analysis under limited-sample conditions. The method reaches meaningful concordance with reference labels while preserving a probabilistic view of ambiguous cases.

This is especially relevant for medical datasets where rare classes are clinically important but underrepresented in training data.

Why it matters

Medical AI methods often need to work with small, imbalanced, and noisy datasets. This study shows how interpretable statistical methods can remain useful in such settings, particularly when uncertainty is part of the clinical decision process.